Baseball-Reference has a function on it's batting splits page where you can see how players performed in high, medium and low-leverage situations. (Leverage is simply a measure of the relative importance of a game situation--two outs in the bottom of the ninth of a tie game is a much higher leverage situation than leading off the game, for instance.) Just click on the Nationals team batting splits page, scroll down to leverage, and then click on the orange highlighted "High leverage" link and each player's performance in those situations pop up. Or just click here if you just want to skip to the full results.
Here are the Nationals ranked by OPS in high leverage situations in 2008:
PA | High Lev. OPS | |
AHernandez | 22 | 1.12 |
AGonzalez | 13 | 1.084 |
RBelliard | 69 | 1.015 |
NJohnson | 30 | 0.95 |
JFlores | 89 | 0.835 |
EDukes | 73 | 0.822 |
DYoung | 44 | 0.79 |
AKearns | 86 | 0.784 |
KCasto | 40 | 0.767 |
JEstrada | 8 | 0.75 |
RLangerhans | 34 | 0.744 |
CGuzman | 108 | 0.655 |
ABoone | 57 | 0.646 |
PLoDuca | 32 | 0.629 |
LMilledge | 131 | 0.593 |
WHarris | 85 | 0.588 |
RMackowiak | 8 | 0.583 |
RZimmerman | 86 | 0.555 |
POrr | 13 | 0.462 |
FLopez | 81 | 0.454 |
RBernadina | 17 | 0.45 |
WNieves | 49 | 0.436 |
WPena | 45 | 0.367 |
EBonifacio | 24 | 0.308 |
LMontz | 8 | 0.25 |
Wow, not what I expected. Go AHern! The AG rocking it. And Ron Belliard (who I would have expected to see) tops the list among players with anything you could possibly consider a meaningful sample size (although really none of these samples are meaningful, but I digress--back to the barstool). Certainly the names on the bottom of this list can't surprise anyone. Pena, Lopez, Bonifacio all near the bottom, and poor ol' Luke Montz is the caboose.
OK, but really if you were going to say, "who was the most clutch," it's not really fair to look at it this way, just based on raw performance in clutch situations. That's because you're mixing in basic hitting ability with the ability to elevate performance in the clutch. To find out who's the most clutch, we should look at the difference between a player's overall performance and their performance in clutch situations. That way we can see who's best able to elevate his play with the game on the line.
By subtracting season-long OPS from OPS in clutch situations, we get this list:
PA | High Lev. OPS | 08 OPS | Clutch Diff. | |
JEstrada | 8 | 0.75 | 0.37 | 0.38 |
AHernandez | 22 | 1.12 | 0.789 | 0.331 |
RBelliard | 69 | 1.015 | 0.845 | 0.17 |
AKearns | 86 | 0.784 | 0.627 | 0.157 |
KCasto | 40 | 0.767 | 0.61 | 0.157 |
AGonzalez | 13 | 1.084 | 0.938 | 0.146 |
JFlores | 89 | 0.835 | 0.698 | 0.137 |
RMackowiak | 8 | 0.583 | 0.462 | 0.121 |
NJohnson | 30 | 0.95 | 0.846 | 0.104 |
PLoDuca | 32 | 0.629 | 0.581 | 0.048 |
DYoung | 44 | 0.79 | 0.794 | -0.004 |
RLangerhans | 34 | 0.744 | 0.776 | -0.032 |
ABoone | 57 | 0.646 | 0.683 | -0.037 |
EDukes | 73 | 0.822 | 0.864 | -0.042 |
RBernadina | 17 | 0.45 | 0.544 | -0.094 |
POrr | 13 | 0.462 | 0.589 | -0.127 |
CGuzman | 108 | 0.655 | 0.786 | -0.131 |
LMilledge | 131 | 0.593 | 0.731 | -0.138 |
WPena | 45 | 0.367 | 0.509 | -0.142 |
FLopez | 81 | 0.454 | 0.619 | -0.165 |
WHarris | 85 | 0.588 | 0.761 | -0.173 |
WNieves | 49 | 0.436 | 0.65 | -0.214 |
RZimmerman | 86 | 0.555 | 0.774 | -0.219 |
EBonifacio | 24 | 0.308 | 0.649 | -0.341 |
LMontz | 8 | 0.25 | 0.593 | -0.343 |
So there you have it. The Washington Nationals' Mr. Clutch 2008: Johnny Estrada. And if it wasn't for the brief appearances by Montz and Bonifacio, Mr. Choker would have been none other than Ryan Zimmerman.
Wow. Who would have guessed that? Not me. Does it matter, and should we expect these performances to continue? No and no. But danged if it doesn't make you go hmmmm... Another round, bartender!
3 comments:
Wouldn't it be worthwhile to weight these by number of plate appearances?
Estrada evidently was really clutch in 8 plate appearances, but Belliard was half as clutch in 8+ times the number of appearances.
Also, by subtracting the regular 08 OPS Estrade gets elevated merely because he sucked so hard/bad/much the non-8 times in the season that weren't high leverage.
this kind of makes me wonder whether players are even aware of high v. low leverage situations, even in an intuitive sense. which in turn makes me wonder what "clutch" even means. presumably, the hitter would have to be aware that his at-bat is unusually important in order to access his clutch ability. but does ron belliard know (or intuit) that his at-bat down by 1 with a runner on in the seventh is more important than his at-bat down by 2 with one out and nobody on in the ninth? maybe clutch ability does exist, but most players aren't aware of which situations are actually clutch. who knows. but i'd be curious to learn whether players' senses of the most important moments in a game are actually the most important moments.
Post a Comment