Thursday, April 29, 2010

Adam Dunn and "Old Player Skills"

Yesterday, we and about a million other people took the Phillies to task for the Ryan Howard contract. So with the concept of "old player skills" and contract extensions on everyone's mind, now seemed like a good time to look at Adam Dunn.

When Dunn first broke into the league, he had a bit of speed, but by his mid-20s he had come to epitomize the concept of the "young player with old player skills." And with his contract up at the end of the year, the Nationals need to make a decision soon about whether to re-sign him or trade him (or hold on to him for a pennant race, I guess).

For the uninitiated, the key old player skills are power and pitch recognition, which translate into lots of homers, walks, and strikeouts. "Young player skills" are speed, defense, and contact ability, which roughly translate into stolen bases and batting average.

To be clear, there's nothing wrong with a player who has old player skills--you can be a great offensive player with lots of homers, walks and strikeouts. Like Adam Dunn. The problem is that young hitters who display
only old player skills tend to age really badly.

A hitter with young player skills might lose speed as he gets older, but he can compensate for that physical decline by learning better pitch recognition and strike zone discipline. In other words, as their young player skills erode, they replace them with the development of old player skills.

A good example is Reggie Jackson. As a young player, Jackson was an all-around great offensive player. As he got older, the power and walks became a more important part of his game, as his speed and batting average declined. Here's a chart that shows pretty well what I'm talking about:


The red and pink lines show Reggie's batting average and stolen bases (young skills) and the green lines show his HR rate and walk rate (old skills). The blue line is wOBA, or his overall offensive value. All these numbers are presented as a ratio of league average. So for instance in his age 25 season, Jackson hit 2.5 times more homers per plate appearance than the average MLB hitter that year.

There are a set of things that jump out at you here. First, there's a lot of zig-zagging and criss-crossing of lines. That shows how he was able to use a wide variety of skills to be successful in different ways across his career. Early on, he has speed and power, but isn't particularly patient. The speed disappears fastest, and his batting average starts to fade a couple years later. Meanwhile, his home run rate actually peaks at age 33, and his very best walk season comes at age 39. This shows how a player with both y0ung player and old player skills can remain a dynamic player into his 30s.

In his last years, it's the batting average that clearly correlates with his steadily declining overall value. What usually happens with older hitters is that bat speed and reaction times slow, holes in their swings grow, and pitchers exploit those holes and gradually win more often, and in Reggie's case finally pulling him below average around age 40.

Now let's look at a player who aged just a bit less well: Richie Sexson. Admittedly, the comparison is a little inappropriate, because Jackson was overall just a way, way better player. But with that caveat, here's Sexson's chart:


First big thing: much less criss-crossing of lines. Like Jackson, Sexson's power was always evident, but he never had Reggie's speed and his batting average only barely edged above average for a year or two around his peak. Also, whereas Jackson didn't really maximize his strike zone discipline until his early 30s, Sexson's walk rate peaked in his late 20s. And a good thing, for him--if he hadn't figured out how to take those extra free passes, he never would have become an all star and never would have gotten that big contract from the M's, because he didn't have the skill set to be successful any other way.

But at age 30-31, gravity starts to kick in, as it does for all of us. Since Sexson had already maxed out his narrow skill set of power and walks, the inevitable reduction in bat speed and reaction time left him with no other skills to lean on and he went right off the cliff. By age 32 he was a below-average offensive player at a premium offensive position, and by 33 he was finished.

Now, let's look at Dunn
(note that the last season listed is his current year, and there's a ton of sample size noise there):


This chart certainly isn't a clone of Sexson's (for starters, Dunn is better), but it's a lot more like Richie's than Reggie's. Again, little criss-crossing: basically one pretty consistent set of skills, walks and power, driving his production throughout the productive portion of his career.

This season, his walk rate is as good ever. That makes sense. One would expect that the big dip in home run rate this season should correct itself shortly, unless Dunn is hurt. And at least for now,
he's still a solidly above average producer.

The line to watch is the red one--the one headed ever so slightly in the wrong direction. The speed of Dunn's decline will track with how fast that line falls, or rather how quickly he loses bat speed and reaction times, creating bigger holes in his swing for pitchers to exploit.

Drilling down one more level, we can look for a few other stats to tell us what's going on with that red line. First, there's BABIP. Batting average is heavily dependent on luck--whether the non-HRs fall in or not. Dunn's BABIP is .277. That's a bit low, but not hugely out of line. Career, he's a .291 BABIP hitter, and slow, fat guys who hit against the shift can be expected by be around there.

Looking at Sexson's collapse and two other well-known fast-faders, Mo Vaughn and David Ortiz, we can find a couple other leading indicators. Strikeout rate is frequently associated with batting average, but since these guys all had sky-high strikeout rates to begin with, those rates don't always jump a huge amount. In fact, it's not uncommon to see these types of players actually improve their K-rates in their collapse year.

What you see more often is an increase in the percentage of balls hit on the ground, a higher percentage of fastballs thrown to them, and the hitter making more outs on those fastballs. This is because they're getting slow on fastballs, start to guess, top more balls into ground outs... simply not driving the ball as much.

All this you can see on the Fangraphs player page--the batted ball section gives you GB% and the pitch type data gives you percentage of fastballs thrown, and the hitter's performance on the fastballs is measured in the linear weights. Sadly, Dunn is in fact seeing more fastballs and hitting more balls on the ground. He's doing ok on those fastballs though, so the data don't all line up... yet.

Bottom line, it's too early in the season to say whether he's just starting low or hitting the beginning of the end. But there are reasons to wonder, if not quite worry, and fans should be watching those key rates closely over the rest of the season.

Tuesday, April 27, 2010

Call Him Up NOW

For chrissake Rizzo. Call him up. Life is short. He's going to get old and retire at some point. You don't bench Michael Jordan. You don't put a Picasso in the basement. You're depriving the world of a cherished, special thing. Somewhere in DC, there's a lifelong baseball fan in a hospice who won't ever get to see Strasburg pitch if you wait another week. Call him up now. You'll have a better chance of getting into heaven.

Monday, April 26, 2010

Revenge on the Phillies Will Be Ours

The Phillies today handed Ryan "Old Player Skills" Howard a five-year, $125 million contract extension. They are now married to Howard to a whopping seven more years through is age-37 season at an average salary of over $20 million a year.

Beyond the Boxscore rounds up the some of the reactions, and they aren't good. Nor should they be. This, like the Alfonso Soriano deal or the Barry Zito contract, has "mistake" written all over it. Fat guys who thrive on walks and power while striking out a lot don't age well. Howard's top 5 comps on Baseball Reference? Richie Sexson, Cecil Fielder, and Mo Vaughn. Zoinks.

Here's another way of looking at it. Baseball Prospectus projects players' future career paths based on what similar players have done in the past. When it comes to projections, there are no guarantees, but there are certain outcomes that are more likely that others. Here's a graph they do called the "Stars & Scrubs" chart:


(This is a subscription-only image, and if you think it's interesting, I really encourage you to go over and buy your own subscription before I hear from the BP guys and they make me take it down. If they can trace enough new subscriptions to this URL, maybe I won't get in trouble. And seriously, if you're reading this, you're enough of a junkie to try out BP. You won't regret it.)

Basically this is telling us that the odds that Howard will be producing at "star" value in 2013 are extremely slim--forget 2017. By the last season on this monstrosity, there's a 75% chance that Howard will be a bench player. There's about a 50% chance that he won't belong in the majors at all.

Add that to a farm system that they emptied out in the Cliff Lee and Roy Halladay deals and the fact that 29-year-old Shane Victorino is their youngest starting position player, and the '10s are looking grim for the Fightins.

So if you're a Nationals fan, make sure you go out to the ballpark the next time the Phillies come to town. Oh sure, they'll beat our heads in again. But you can feel free to show off a smug grin, secure in the knowledge that this Phillies team is headed for a cliff. By 2013, when Stephen Strasburg and Ryan Zimmerman will be in their primes and Bryce Harper will be breaking into the majors, they're going to have a $25 million-a-year out-machine parked in the middle of their line-up and little help on the way.

Our day is coming, and with Stan's excellent marketing, you know that Phillies fans will be here to take the beatings in person when the time comes

Sunday, April 25, 2010

Reality or Illusion?

The Nationals are 10-9 and tied for second place in the National League East, just a game and a half behind Philadelphia and a game back of the Wild Card lead (yes, that's silly to say in April, but there it is). ESPN's Jayson Stark says it's "reality." Is he right?

Well, for starters, they have 10 games in the win column already. That's as real as the Yankees' 27 world championships, and it's not going to change. Last year they won their tenth game on May 8. They won their 20th game on June 19. Let that sink in. The reality is that with 10 wins in the books already, it's going to be really hard for them to lose 100 games again.

Here are some of the key reasons why they might keep winning:

1. The schedule. The Phillies are by far the class of the NL, and they've already played them six times, stealing a crucial two wins to avoid sweeps in both series. They've also played six against the Dodgers and the Rockies, both playoff teams last year. They play the Phillies nine more times, but not till game number 103. They get the Orioles five times, starting with a three-game set a month from now. Then they go out West for six against the Padres and Giants, which won't be easy, before getting this stretch of softness: Houston, Cincy, Pittsburgh, Cleveland, Detroit, White Sox (ok those two teams are pretty good), Kansas City, and again the Orioles. It's going to be tough to be much below .500 in that stretch. That takes you to July.

2. Stephen Strasburg. Yes, they have other reinforcements coming, but really Strasburg is the difference-maker. In 1984, the New York Mets went 21-10 in games started by a 19-year-old rookie named Dwight Gooden. The next season, they went 28-7 in Dr. K's starts. Are the Nationals' hitters as good as the Mets were? No. Is it outrageously unfair to set the expectations that high? Without question. Screw it. I'm in love.

3. The bullpen. Sometimes guys get hot for 65 innings. Sometimes three guys get hot for 65 innings. Matt Capps is going to blow some saves, and he might go back to an ERA over 4 next year, but he could certainly do what Chad Cordero did in 2005. Tyler Clippard is another great example of a guy who just might have one or two really good relief seasons in him. He's hitting his spots, hides the ball really well, and could easily be this year's Gary Majewski. Throw in solid contributions from a couple others, and you got yourself an above-average bullpen. (Now, all that could fall apart tomorrow too, but we're talking about why it's possible--we'll get to doubts in a moment.)

4. Ian Desmond. He certainly hasn't been the greatest thing since sliced bread, but he's transitioned into a Major League regular, and his talent shows. Of all the Nationals' starters, he's the one you could see really getting better over the course of the season.

5. The fielding. It's still pretty bad, but it's better, and Riggleman is doing a nice job with the late-inning replacements. After a rough start, Desmond has been solid. Morgan and Harris are a dynamic duo in the outfield. Those are three big upgrades from last year. Zimmerman of course remains arguably the best fielder at any position in baseball.

But of course, there are reasons to be suspicious:

1. Run differential. They've been outscored 84-100, which translates to an 8-11 Pythagorean record (.421). Over the course of an entire season, that would give the team 68 wins, They're 3-1 in one-run games and 1-4 in blowouts. Teams can certainly exceed--or fall short of--their Pythagorean projection over the course of an entire year, as evidenced by the fact that the Nationals fell seven wins shy of their Pythagorean W-L record last season. But most of the time these things even out.

2. Adam Dunn. I'm really worried about him. I'll have more on this in a couple days, but every day he reminds me more and more of a left-handed Richie Sexson. He's always been the classic example of the young player with old player skills. Assuming he's healthy, he's going to get his 30 homers. But with a .217 batting average, he becomes a a detriment to the team.

3. Zimmerman's hammy. These things linger, and while it hasn't shown up yet, the drop-off from Zimmerman to Alberto Gonzalez could easily be worth 8 wins over the course of a full season. (Not that Zimmerman is going to be lost for the season, just that we can't afford to lose him any more if we're going to see .500.)

4. Ivan Rodriguez. You mean a .460 BABIP isn't sustainable? A 38-year-old catcher playing this much can be expected to fade anyway, but regardless he's gotta hit 20 sharply hit outs in a row before the luck evens out. In fairness, it's not all luck. He's only struck out four times all year--he's definitely locked in. But only seven of his 23 hits are for extra bases, and those are all doubles, and his walk rate remains Guzman-esque. It's just not humanly possible to be consistently effective this way.

5. The starting pitching. Losing Jason Marquis really, really hurts, and at this point, with the way he's pitched and the health reports, the odds of him being a major contributor now seem pretty remote.
John Lannan is well-covered territory. Let's just say I can't figure out why these guys are wrong, and hope isn't a reason. Livan Hernandez is striking out 3.38 per 9 while stranding 100% and allowing a .158 BABIP and a 6.3% HR/FB rate. If those numbers don't mean a lot to you... it means he's lucky as all get-out. The over/under for his ERA is still 5.00. Scott Olsen looked very good today, but he's still got an ERA over 6.00, and the Garret Anderson strikeouts should have an asterisk next to them. He shouldn't even be in MLB, much less starting against lefties. Craig Stammen? Luis Atilano? Hey, I'll root for those guys, but we're playing really long odds here. All together, this is a group that could still really kill a team.

Friday, April 23, 2010

Belated Eating Guide to Opening Day

(Sorry, I meant to get this up before Opening Day like I did last year, but it didn't happen.)

Everyone knows you can carry in food at the stadium, right? Why anyone buys food at the park is beyond me. Here are my recommendations for local eateries, as a long-time Hill resident. If you're driving in, these are all easy pit stops on the way. If you're taking the Metro, you can get out at Eastern Market or Capitol South, and then grab the Union Station-Navy Yard Circulator bus, which runs past all these places every 10 minutes and takes you right to the stadium for a buck.

La Plaza (Mexican and Salvadorean)
629 Pennsylvania Ave SE
(202) 546-9512
Fantastic margaritas, yummy bottomless chips and salsa, and the best damn service you'll get anywhere. The place is run by a great guy named Henry Mendoza, and pretty much everyone I know who's gone there became a regular. You have a lot of choices for Mexican on the Hill, but forget Banana Cafe, Las Placitas, or La Lomita. La Plaza es el mejor.

Sanphan (Thai)
653 Pennsylvania Ave. SE
(202) 544-9368
Great Thai place. I always get the panang curry or pad see ew tofu, which can all be served with chicken, beef, pork, tofu or seafood, and the blanket shrimp appetizer is perfect picnic type food.

Cava (Mediterranean tapas)
527 8th Street SE
(202) 543-9090
This place is absolutely delicious. Great addition to the Hill restaurants. Cold tapas is a good carry out option, though it may be better as a snack than a meal. Like La Plaza, this is worth leaving extra time and eating before or after the game on the weekend.

Good Stuff Eatery (burgers)
303 Pennsylvania Ave S.E.
(202) 543-8222
There's a Five Guys right by the park, but for my money Good Stuff beats Five Guys with a stick all day long. The owner is a guy named Spike who went on one of those TV cooking reality shows on cable. All the burgers are great, and I recommend also getting the onion rings and a milkshake (don't forget to finish the shake before you get to the park--you can't carry in drinks).

Capitol Hill Tandoor & Grill (Indian)
419 8th Street SE
(202) 547-3233
Good, reasonably priced Indian food, easy to carry out and eat in the bowls they give you. They aren't super-slow or anything, but it's a good idea to call 10-15 minutes ahead if you're in a rush. I recommend the malai kofta and paneer makhni entrees, and don't forget the kashmiri naan and vegetable pakora appetizer.

Starfish Cafe (seafood)
539 8th Street, SE
(202) 546-5006
This is more of a sit-down place, but you won't be sorry carrying out a po' boy. They come in shrimp, catfish, oysters, and scallops varieties. This isn't really a budget option, but you'll get your money's worth. Also if you have a minute I recommend a mojito at the bar.

Luis Atilano Gets his Shot

Luis Atilano gets his first start tonight at Nationals Park. He's a former sandwich-round draft pick of the Atlanta Braves. He's known as a strike-thrower without overpowering stuff and strong groundball tendencies. He's a pure Mike Rizzo Special.

(Random trivia: Atilano was the Braves' compensatory pick for the loss of free agent Tom Glavine, and the next two players drafted that year were Jarrod Saltalamacchia and Adam Jones. Atilano went 35th overall. The Expos pick that year at #20 overall was Chad Cordero. The Nationals acquired him in a trade for Daryle Ward while Atilano was recovering from Tommy John surgery in 2007.)

You may not have heard of him before this week, but Atilano's got some upside. He's a pretty big guy (6'2", 220) who obviously was considered a prospect when the Braves drafted him and gave him a $950,000 bonus. Injuries slowed him down, but he never dropped off the prospect radar, ranking #20 on the Baseball America list this past off-season.

If he can develop a solid breaking pitch to compliment his sinking fastball, he could quickly work his way into the longer term picture with Strasburg, Zimmermann, and Lannan. If not, he's got the markings of a solid bullpen arm. Either way, I'll be interested in seeing him pitch tonight, and don't be shocked if he passes Olsen and Stammen on the organizational depth chart by the All-Star Game.

Another thing that interested me here is that the Atilano promotion is another example of a Rizzo tendency I've noticed over the last year--a resistance to typecasting players and a commitment to rewarding (and punishing) results.

What I mean is that he's been much more willing than most GMs to give guys a shot when he thinks they've "earned it," even older players or guys who have been off the prospect radar. He also tries to make sure everyone who's earned a shot gets his shot and doesn't fret that much about making players "wait their turn." And of course the flip-side of this principle is that he's quicker to pull the plug on guys who don't deliver.

Case in point: in most organizations, the next call-up for the rotation would have been J.D. Martin. Not necessarily because he's better than Atilano, but because "he's been there and shown he can do it." And of course in most organizations J.D. Martin never would have gotten that chance in the first place. A 26-year-old minor league free agent years from the prospect radar... most organizations would have simply labeled him an organizational arm and moved on.

Other examples: Craig Stammen, Ross Detwiler, Mike MacDougal, and Nyjer Morgan. The first two guys would have had to wait longer to get their shot in most organizations, while MacDougal might not have gotten the chance to close as quickly as he did, and Nyjer Morgan might never have been given the chance to prove he can be an everyday centerfielder.

It's one of those old baseball cliches that you're always better off with veteran players who have been there. The economics of baseball under the current collective bargaining agreement has cut against this cliche by strongly incentivizing signing young players with little service time over guys like, oh, Jermaine Dye for instance.

But the old school mentality lives on, embodied in people like Dusty Baker. Rizzo (and Riggleman is also part of this, though I think it comes from Rizzo first) seems to be trying to be the anti-Dusty, creating an organizational culture where everyone feels like they have a shot if they work hard and perform. Riggleman is implementing the a similar principle by using his bench players a ton so everyone feels engaged and no one feels totally safe in his job.

Now, I'm not totally sure this is 100% a good thing. Ideally, you'd have a team where there are 24 good players who play well and you only make moves when you have to address unexpected developments. (And the number of unexpected developments is kept to a minimum.) It's possible that this is just the same old dumpster-diving in a different package.

But for now I'm staying open-minded that this isn't just Rizzo being resourceful on a tiny budget or a continuation of Bowden's endless and pointless roster tinkering. But for now, I'm keeping an open mind that Rizzo's implementing sound a management principle that just might help his team get better faster.

While We're on the Subject of Pointless Blog Posts that Add No Insight or Substantive Value Whatsoever...

This is a pretty good example. Do we really need another blogger blogging about how other bloggers aren't as smart as some other blogger thinks he is? Wake me when we can talk about baseball.

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

He's Ready

Total for the year: 12.1 IP, 7 H, 1 ER, 3 BB, 17 K, 0.73 ERA. Enough of this Scott Olsen / Garrett Mock nonsense. It's time for the Strasburg Era to begin.

Monday, April 19, 2010

A Few Items on Blogs, Blogging, and the Blog

Some minor housekeeping notes about things surely only I'm interested in...

--MASN invited the NatRoots bloggers to watch the game from a suite on Saturday. A full fridge of beer, shrimp cocktail, and did I mention a full fridge of beer? And if you think I might be more inclined to pull punches or show MASN favoritism after getting wined and dined a little, you're right, I will! Too bad Jim never figured out that I'm so easily bribed.

--Did I mention that the MASN website is significantly improved, with easier navigation plus more and better content? Having Ben Goessling gives them a real shoe-leather reporter that they never really had before, plus there's the sure-to-be-interesting-at-least-once Mike Rizzo blog.

--I'm disabling the ability to post anonymous comments. I enabled it a few months ago just cuz I thought it might make it more convenient for some folks from time to time. But 95% of the anonymous comments are clearly just people being rude and hiding behind anonymity. I don't mind getting heckled. That's part of the deal. But if people wanna call me names, you're gonna have to identify yourself. (Especially you-know-who-you-are.)

--A few of the Nationals fan bloggers have been credentialed as media. I say good for them. Dave and Cheryl Nichols in particular worked long and hard to open this door for themselves and a few others. I think they'll have fun, and that's cool. And ultimately, competition is good for consumers. More reporters and more content can only be good for the overall coverage of the team, even if you never go on Dave's blog or Jeff's.

--I've decided I prefer NatRoots to Natmosphere or Natosphere.

--Friend of the NatRoots Rob Neyer chose Harper Gordeck's excellent Oleanders and Morning Glories blog for his ESPN Sweet Spot network. It's a great choice, and if you're interested in other team blogs out there, Rob's list isn't a bad place to start.

--I think all my real-life Nationals friends know this, but I'm moving to Portland, Maine. There are no truth to the rumors that I'm moving to get away from the MLB.tv blackout of live Nationals broadcasts. Nor will I stop rooting for the Nationals. And if I did, I will never root for the Red Sox. Never, ever. In the meantime, you can look forward to fewer posts about me attending "blogger days," an occasional in-person scouting report when the Chiefs visit the Sea Dogs, and otherwise not much will change.

Sunday, April 18, 2010

See? Free Agents Can Suck Too!

There's a certain school of thought, let's call it the Boswell Delusion, that says that the Washington Nationals would have been a winning team all this time if only they had gone out and spent on free agents like Alfonso Soriano, Andruw Jones, Aaron Rowand, Barry Zito, and Jason Marquis.

Oops. Turns out, while draft picks aren't a sure thing, neither are free agents. And Marquis through at least three starts is turning out to be quite a bit less than the Nationals were expecting when they handed him the fourth richest contract signed by any starting pitcher this past off season.

By now you surely have heard that Marquis got absolutely massacred today by the Milwaukee Brewers, allowing seven earned runs, on four hits, a walk, and two HBPs. In case you were wondering it was the 16th time since 1920 ("the Retrosheet Era") that any pitcher has allowed seven or more earned runs in a start without recording an out.

Now, I'm not a big fan of Marquis. Even when he's been "good," his K rates were awful, and coming off a career year he seemed a poor bet for anything but a major regression.
I said going into the off-season that the free agent SPs I would have targeted were Joel Piniero, Jon Garland, Jarrod Washburn, Jarrod Washburn and Braden Looper. (By the way, those last two guys are still looking for contracts.)

Still, I thought it was a reasonable signing given the cost of free agent pitching and the need for a veteran innings-eater or three. I didn't think we'd be seeing unfavorable comps to Daniel Cabrera, that's for sure.

In fairness to Marquis, Riggleman had a really quick hook today. No question, especially for the three-batter sequence from Braun to McGehee, Marquis looked terrible. He was overthrowing badly, leaving his sinker up in the zone, and generally looking totally out of whack. Overall, he threw 28 pitches and just 13 strikes.

Still, he only threw 28 pitches. And in fact, he actually looked like he was starting to find himself during Jim Edmonds at bat, hitting his spots with a sinker-change-slider combination to get ahead 0-2. Then he bizarrely threw a curveball, a pitch he hardly ever throws, and hit the left-handed Edmonds in the foot. I watched the replay twice on MLB.tv to try to figure out if Marquis shook off a sign there, since the pitch selection was so bad, but I couldn't tell. Then Greg Zaun went the other way on a 3-2 sinker on the outside corner that wasn't a terrible pitch, and Marquis was done, leaving the bases loaded and the Brewers up 4-0 with no outs.

Miguel Batista of course did the rest of the damage, including giving up the grand slam to the corpse of Craig Counsell, who wasn't much of a player in his prime and came in batting .077 for the year.

You certainly can't blame Riggleman for pulling a pitcher who faced 7 batters and gotten none out, but it still unusual treatment for a veteran pitcher routinely referred to as the clear-cut #2 in the rotation. You wonder whether Riggleman was in his "send a message" mode or if he was looking for an excuse to let everyone in the bullpen pitch (he apparently talked enough about that to generate a news brief in the Post this am about the Nationals' "overrested" bullpen).

That's a situation where you'd like to see the veteran pitcher work through his mechanical issues and maybe bounce back to give you 3-4 innings. You see it all the time around the league where a guy just loses his release point for a stretch and then suddenly finds it again and looks ok for a bit.

If Riggleman really thought that he had a better chance of winning by asking his bullpen to go nine than he did letting Marquis work through it, you wonder if the team has already started to change it's view of Marquis, and if he's at risk of getting send down to work it out in the sticks. Something to watch, anyway.

BTW--this is a hilarious new degree of absurdly positive spin for the headline writers at Nationals.com. Oh, but remember, "this story was not subject to the approval of Major League Baseball or its clubs."

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Trivia Question: Who Threw the 3 Previous CG, SHOs in Nationals History?

Today, Livan Hernandez threw the first complete game shutout by a Washington Nationals pitcher this season.

On my way out of the game, a dude selling hats said to me, "did you know that was the first complete game shutout ever for the Nationals since they came back?" I of course told him he was wrong and bet him one of his hats. Thanks to my aircard and through the magic of Baseball Reference, I had a free hat in about 30 seconds.

But I was surprised to learn the three pitchers who had previously accomplished the feat. I guessed Livan Hernandez in 2005, but that was wrong. So who were they?

There's a decent chance that you remember that John Lannan threw one and that in 2005 John Patterson threw one. The third one is the real stumper.

The answer is Pedro Astacio, who faced just two more than the minimum 27 batters in a 9-inning 2-hit, no walk masterpiece against the Braves in August 2006.

If you got all three, congratulations. (But I'm keeping my free cap.)

Beating Gallardo and Getting to .500

The Nationals picked up a series-opening win against Milwaukee last night, beating one of the very best pitchers in the National League and evening their record at 5-5. That, friends, is the latest they've been at .500 since the last game of 2005. Is that a pathetically low bar to celebrate? Of course. But baby steps, people, baby steps.

They won because John Lannan didn't let the soft bottom of the Brewers lineup hurt him, holding Carlos Gomez, Greg Zaun, Alcides Escobar, and Yovani Gallardo to a combined 0-for-12.

Plus, the bullpen went two full innings without a walk. Sean Burnett hit the strike zone with 5 of 7 pitches, a much-needed change. The Nationals can't afford for him to be this year's Saul Rivera, and that's how he's looked so far.

And, of course, another come-from-behind win. Put another small feather on the scale in favor of Rizzo's "seasoned veteran" approach.

Other random thoughts and nit-picks "after the jump."

* * *

Even with Zimmerman out, Willie Harris shouldn't be used as a defensive replacement at third base.

* * *

Again, Stephen Strasburg is ready. One-and-a-half starts in AA isn't much, but he's not learning anything mowing down AA meat. I'd like to see him called up for his next start and Craig Stammen sent down. Depending on how things get reshuffled in the rotation, that would mean Strasburg debuts at home against the Rockies probably Wednesday or Thursday. Either way, it's time.

* * *

Riggleman! You're killing me with the sacrifice bunts!

Situation: Bottom of the eighth inning, Nationals trail 3-2, runners on first a second, no outs. Ian Desmond at the plate with Adam Kennedy, Wil Nieves, and pinch-hitting Ryan Zimmerman due up.

What does Riggleman do? He calls for the sac bunt, giving away a precious out and taking the bat away from Desmond, the hitter with by far the chance of getting the game-winning extra-base hit they needed.

Strictly playing the numbers, the play was pretty close to a wash--the successful sacrifice very marginally increased the Nationals' odds of winning from 55.4% to 55.9%. And in hindsight, Kennedy got a double and drove in both runs.

But consider that if Kennedy (.281 OBP) and Nieves (.250 OBP) make outs, then the threat ends with Zimmerman in the on-deck circle. Or imagine if the Brewers had come back for two in the ninth, and the Nationals' missed chance at a bigger inning had cost them the game. You just can't afford to give away outs from position players like that.

* * *

New rule: if Stan Kasten's going to keep marketing aggressively to Phillies fans, he should have to sit next to this guy.

* * *

Adam Dunn got himself tossed in what must be lesson #1,203,167 on why it never pays to fight with umps over balls and strikes. The umps always get the last word, and if they want to eject your best hitter to remind you who's boss, they will.

This is why Joe Girardi told his team's d-bag owner Jeffrey Loria* to shut his trap when Loria was heckling umps from a box seat. Now THAT was courageous, and it cost him is job. But I bet Girardi's young pitchers got a few more calls after that.

This isn't the NBA, where "working the refs" is considered an acceptable part of the game. Fans might like the NBA better, and if you do, good news for you, the playoffs are starting and you can watch the NBA.

MLB umps have a different standard. They don't take no lip, and they feel license to enforce baseball etiquette by going against the loud-mouths on close calls. Just ask Milton Bradley. Arguing balls and strikes like Dunn did last night doesn't show toughness or intensity. It shows stupidity and lack of poise, and sooner or later it'll cost the team wins.

*D-bag Jeffrey Loria is one of the few people in baseball who gets a permanent exception from my general "no name-calling" rule of thumb.

Friday, April 16, 2010

One Impressive Ex-National

On the Nationals off day Wednesday, I watched the Rangers-Indians, and I was pretty impressed with a certain former National. No, not that one or that one. This one.

Colby Lewis was part of the great spring training starting pitching cattle call of 2006, but he didn't stick, getting released before opening day. Eventually he found his way to Japan, where he developed a cutter and put up a K:BB rate just shy of ten. You've probably seen this article by Tim Kurkjian about Lewis's development overseas.

The Rangers, the team the drafted him in the first place, signed him for a one-year, $5 million contract. In two starts, Lewis has gone 12.1 innings and allowed just three runs with 13 Ks. He has also walked 8, which is way too many, and at 30 years old he is what he is.

But you gotta hand it to Jon Daniels, who despite being handcuffed by the sale of his team and sitting on a bumper crop of cheap, young, excellent pitchers, still out-scouted 29 other GMs to a solid mid-rotation starter for a potential playoff team.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

The Nationals Salvage Another One

As I've said before, the first item on the agenda for Rizzo and Riggleman in 2010 is to simply avoid the kind of first-month tailspin that has turned the Nationals into an afterthought/laughingstock by the end of the third week each of the last three seasons.

The schedule-makers didn't make that job any easier by handing the Nationals a brutal opening month schedule, including six against Philadelphia, three against Los Angeles, and four against Colorado.

There are obviously no "big games" in April, but the Nationals took another pretty important step away from April oblivion by narrowly dodging a series sweep by the
Phillies for the second time in seven days.

There were a bunch of things I really liked about today's performance. First, there's the obvious come-from-behind win on the road after getting their heads beaten in for two days. This team is showing some of the poise and bounce-back ability that
Rizzo was looking for when he stocked up on "seasoned" veterans. Poo-poo the value of clubhouse chemistry all you want (and I do), but it's hard to imagine last year's group pulling off today's win.

I also like
Riggleman's continued willingness to break outside the box on bullpen management, asking Matt Capps to give him a five-out save on the road. Capps will never be confused with Mariano Rivera, and his early season walk totals haven't been real encouraging. But all the manager can do is choose the best option from what's available, and Capps for five outs is better than Brian Bruney for two. Even after Shane Victorino hit a homer to lead off the ninth and with the left-handed Nationals-killers Utley and Howard looming, Capps pounded the strike zone and got it done on a manageable 33 pitches. That's why he was brought here.

And, of course, there was Ryan Zimmerman being Ryan Zimmerman. (Even if that was a cheap Citizens Bank special.)

Heck, I'm in such a good mood, I'll even acknowledge that Scott Olsen's velocity and 5 strikeouts in 5.2 innings were somewhat encouraging for a guy who hasn't missed bats consistently since the days when Tom
DeLay represented the good people of Sugarland in Congress.

(Though let's not go overboard. The ERA is still 6.35. And he reminded us that he would be a better fit as a Jerry Springer guest than a
MLB pitcher by shooting his mouth off at the homeplate umpire on his way out of the game and having a little temper-tantrum in the dugout. Other than that, no complaints.)

A few more quick thoughts "after the jump."


* * *

Aaron Crow has two starts under his belt for the Northwest Arkansas Naturals. He's gone 10.2 innings and allowed 2 earned runs with 7 strikeouts against 4 walks and a 5.25
groundout to flyout ratio. Just so you know.

* * *

Nick Johnson's going to score a hell of a lot of runs batting second with a .410+ OBP for the Yankees. He belongs as a DH, and the Nationals got solid value for him, so I'm not griping at all. But it's pretty stunning that it took this long for Nick to find his way into a full-time DH role. It's really easy for me to imagine him being a key piece of a lot of really good teams for another 2-3 years.

* * *

Don't be shocked if the Blue Jays grab Jason Bergmann on waivers after he was DFA-ed by the Nationals. He's one of those New York-New Jersey boys who former Nationals scouting director and current Toronto AGM Dana Brown loves so much. If Bergmann's gone, I wish him luck. As all Nationals fans should know by now, he's a great guy, and for about a month in 2007, he delivered one of the most impressive stretches of pitching of any National since the team came back.

Monday, April 12, 2010

Riggleman Gets Ejected, Guarantees a Nationals Victory

It's a universally understood fact around these parts that the #1 reason the Nationals lost 100 games two years in a row is that Manny Acta refused to argue with umpires.

Today, Jim Riggleman showed what a better manager he is than Acta. With the Nationals leading 4-1 in the 4th inning, Riggleman did his part to contribute to the victory by coming out to complain about how the home plate umpire was calling balls and strikes.

Because of Riggleman's excellent arguing ability, it became immediately obvious that the Nationals would win easily. In fact, I turned off the game right after he got booted because it was so obvious that the Phillies would never ever win a game when Riggleman did such a good job arguing with the umpires.

I can't believe that dummy Manny never realized that he could win more games if he'd just argue more. < /snark >

Sunday, April 11, 2010

I've Seen Enough: He's Ready

Stephen Strasburg blew away the Altoona Curve today, going five innings, allowing one earned run, and whiffing eight of the 22 batters he faced. Look at some of these at bats. When the ball is in the catcher's mitt and you still haven't even started your swing, just don't bother.

Not to pick on the Curve, but even for a Double-A team, they don't have much in the way of bats. Gorkys Hernandez and Josh Harrison were the only guys Strasburg faced today who made Pittsburgh's Baseball America top 30 prospects, at #10 and #29. So it's possible that Strasburg will get a little more tested as he works his way through the Eastern League.

But I doubt it. This kid isn't going to be tested till he's facing the Phillies in the Bank, and there will be days when they won't stand a chance either.

I usually like to keep a lid on the hype when it comes to prospects. It's just kind of unfair to ask them to come out and do what's never been done before.

But in this case, forget it. We've got one of the best pitchers on the planet. Give it another week or so and his free agent year will be delayed. That's enough. Making Strasburg blow away the likes of Shelby Ford till June to delay an arbitration year that we already bought out anyway is just absurd.

Charlie and Dave Drop Some Saber Goodness

Charlie and Dave got an email question today on the pregame show about overrated or misleading stats, and they gave a remarkably good answer, throwing out several really terrible stats and given really good explanations for why those stats aren't good any good:
  • Fielding percentage: Dave talked about Kevin Kouzmanoff as the quintessential example of a player with bad range but few errors who's overall a pretty lousy fielder despite a league-leading fielding percentage. Dropped Jason Werth as another good example and plugged UZR as a better alternative.
  • Relief pitcher ERA: They explained how because of inherited runners, partial innings, and small sample size, why relief pitcher ERAs are misleading with 2-3 quick recent examples from the Nationals.
  • Holds: Charlie just dismissed this as a just a nonsense stat "created for arbitration hearings." Precisely.
  • Blown saves and relief pitching wins: they tossed these in at the end for good measure.
They would have gotten even more bonus points if they had mentioned WPA or xFIP as better relief pitcher stats, but as far as they went, this was a pretty nice bit of sabermetric analysis in an easily digestible form for the mainstream radio audience.

Saturday, April 10, 2010

(Past) Time to Move on with Mock

There were reasons to be intrigued by Garrett Mock when the Nationals traded for him in 2006. Even going into last season, his hard sinker and big curveball made it easy to project him as a solid mid-rotation starter or maybe even a late-inning reliever.

If you're looking at his ERA and wondering what on Earth I'm talking about, look at the back-to-back strikeouts of Jason Bay and David Wright last night. He can make a lot of bats miss, and if he could ever hit his spots and work ahead in the count, he could be a poor man's Brett Myers, circa 2006.

Of course, he can't, and
two weeks shy of age 27, he's long past the point of dreaming on, if you aren't seeing results. Last night really ought to be the last nail in the coffin of his career as a Nationals starter. If you can't get out of the fourth inning pitching at CitiField against these Mets, then you just can't do it. Do we really need to watch him take his turn against Philly before moving on?

The big question is why Mike Rizzo is still showing so much faith in the guy. No, Scott Olsen isn't the solution either, nor is J.D. Martin or whoever else we're likely to see. But Rizzo's had a year and a full off-season to come up with a solution, and if Mock is among his top four starters now, it's because he chose to make it so.

Don't forget that Mock was a Rizzo draft pick way back in the day in Arizona, and he fits the ground-balling profile that Rizzo loves so much.

So Mock is just a Rizzo cheeseball. No mystery. And if you want to keep a guy like that around in Harrisburg to see if the light ever goes on, fine. But you don't use precious rotation spots for that kind of thing. This is a mistake, and Rizzo needs to recognize it and move on.

Thursday, April 8, 2010

The Nationals Get One

Yes, the Nationals are still terrible. And no, I'm not trying to make a big deal out of one win in the third game of the season in which we beat Nelson "Softball Girls" Figueroa, a pitcher who was released by the pitching-impoverished New York Mets just a couple days ago.

But this was a tight, hard-fought win against the NL champs. And the Nationals are a team that has lost so often so many ways for so long, that pulling out a victory like this is something to build on. They got the first win of the year in the books and showed some of the poise and resiliency that Mike Rizzo was hoping for when he overhauled the clubhouse.

And now they're 1-2 with a 3-game series coming up against the miserable Mets. The Nationals' pitching is bad, but against a line-up that includes out-machines like Mike Jacobs (.294 OBP in '09), Jeff Francoeur (.309), Rod Barajas (.258!), plus Gary Matthews, Alex Cora if Jose Reyes isn't back, AND a pitcher... well, it's a damn sight from the Phillies. It's suddenly not hard to imagine this team finishing their first week above .500.

Does that matter in the long run? Not really, but job one for this team is avoid being a laughingstock, and to do that they have to avoid the opening month tailspin that's become their calling card. Some other observations from win #1 of 2010 after the "jump."

* * *

Pulling Craig Stammen after five innings was a head-scratcher. He'd only thrown 75 pitches, and he had just survived his third trip through the Utley-Howard-Werth part of the Phillies order. No, he wasn't fooling anyone, but Stammen never does, and his #1 redeeming quality (as MASN must have reminded us a dozen times) is his efficiency. And betting on the bullpen holding the Phillies for four innings is a poor bet. God forbid we'd reached extra innings. There was just no reason to pull him without at least letting him start the next inning.

* * *

While we're on Riggleman's case, sacrificing Nyjer Morgan in the bottom of the 7th was the kind of dumb over-managing that drives statheads crazy.

The situation was a tie score, no outs, runner on first. Due up: Morgan, Guzman, Zimmerman. The aforementioned Mets castoff Figueroa pitching. By executing a successful sacrifice, Morgan's but reduced the Nationals run expectancy for the inning from 0.95 to 0.72 and their win expectancy from 62.5% to 57.4%. Especially given the Phillies' line-up and the Nationals' bullpen, you have to play for more than one run, but since calling for the bunt reduced the likelihood of even scoring one run, it was the wrong decision no matter what.

Now, Zimmerman's fluky bloop double later in the inning allowed the Nationals to score anyway, but had the Phillies scored again to tie, that decision could have cost them the game. And again, with a position player, it's not a judgment call--it's just giving away a precious out for no reason.

* * *

Nothing looks real easy for Adam Kennedy at second base, does it?

* * *

Since I never saw anyone rip Boz over it, I will now. Roy Halladay was not signed as a free agent. The Phillies traded for him. I know it's hard to keep up with everything that's happened in baseball since Cal Ripken retired, but this was only the top blockbuster trade in baseball in the last year. C'mon Boz. At least let Kilgore fact-check your stuff.

* * *

In case you were wondering, the Nationals are on pace for 1134 walks this season. The record is 835, by the 1949 Boston Red Sox.

Marquis de Suck

I'm not calling him that. But, as a service, I thought I'd remind everyone that this is the proper mock nickname for Jason Marquis haters.

And if Nationals fans were looking for a reason not to like him, Marquis wasted no time giving us plenty. In his first inning as a National, he walked three, hit one, and threw a wild pitch that allowed a run to score from third. Whew! Our crack stats team says that they have no idea how many pitchers have managed that feat in their first inning pitching for a new team, but that they all were very very bad.

Ugh. Yes, it was just one game. Marquis may still be the perfectly below average ERA, 200-IP pitcher we're paying for. Still, the whole reason Marquis is here is to save the bullpen, keep your team in the game--especially at times like this when they need a stabilizing force. So immediately upon taking on this role, he comes out and sucks whatever wind the team may have had in its sails.

This is why you good teams don't count on pitchers like this as #2 starters. He's the kind of pitcher you want to slide in as your #4, and hope for the best, but be prepared for the worst. He doesn't strike anyone out, and his command isn't particularly exceptional. Yes, he gets a lot of groundballs, but he gives up a lot of line-drives as well. And if he sees any jump at all in his walk rate, he could go from an admirable role-player on a staff to mop-up fodder fast.

The Nationals desperately need to avoid another embarrassing season-opening skid, but at this point they're just nowhere near competitive. And Garrett Mock still hasn't pitched yet!

Still, tomorrow's another day, Kyle Kendrick is as hittable as they come, and Craig Stammen can theoretically pitch well. It sounds silly to say it, but to avoid the creeping sense of deja vu and avoid making fans start talking about the #1 draft pick before Memorial Day (again), they really could use a win tomorrow.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

The First Big Test of Rizzo's Way

Yes, it's absurd to say the second game of the season is a big test. But for the Nationals, it will tell us a lot to see how they react to their bludgeoning on opening day. In particular, it will tell us whether Mike Rizzo's (over)emphasis on high-character veteran clubhouse guys has any value.

Jason Marquis is pitching. Ivan Rodriguez will catch. Ian Desmond will be the only non-veteran on the field. This is the kind of game that the new, poised, professional Nationals are supposed show up with short memories and compete.

Now, I'm obviously no big fan of this approach, but I do recognize that the Nationals have had problems over the last two years shaking off tough losses--especially at the beginning of the year. Last year, they opened 5-16 in April. The year before that, they opened 8-17. And whether it was Joel Hanrahan or Felipe Lopez or Paul LoDuca, you didn't have to wait very long to see guys either throwing in the towel or pushing the panic button.

Some veteran stability could certainly help solve that problem. Will it? We'll start to find out tonight.

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

MASN WebAds Fail

I'm on Nationals.com, and if you click on any article, you see a web ad on the right hand side of the page. The first panel looks like this:


Hmm... they've drawn me in. The Nationals lose a lot, but even I can't argue that you Zimmerman delivers web gems on a regular basis. OK, I'll watch. When's the game on, I think to myself? MASN knows that's what I'm thinking, so the helpfully switches to the next game time... except... Doh!

Monday, April 5, 2010

A Bad Day at the Ballpark Is Still Better than a Red Hot Poker to the Eye

News flash: the Nationals are still terrible. They won 59 games last year, and let's face it--they didn't really get better. Yes, Strasburg will be a star. But Brian Bruney? Adam Kennedy? Ivan Rodriguez? And remember, they got just about the best possible performances from Ryan Zimmerman, Josh Willingham, Adam Dunn, and John Lannan. Don't forget to subtract 91 innings of Jordan Zimmermann this year. Now, in fairness, Pythagoras had them at 66 wins last year. So if their luck evens out, they should gain 7 wins right there. But what we saw today is an honest reflection of the gap between the Nationals and a playoff team. The Nationals are still terrible.

Wasting Time Today while your Boss Isn't Looking

I highly recommend this.

The Nationals Will Reach .500 If...

Listeners to yesterday's podcast can hear NFA Brian, NI Mark, and I discuss this topic as well. But here's my list of the most likely events that, together, would produce winning baseball in Washington this year:
  • Zimmerman, Dunn, and Willingham are all as good as last season and miss no significant time to injury.
  • A healthy Adam Kennedy gives the team solid defense to go along with a 350 OBP and .410 SLG--enough for 2+ WAR.
  • Guzman plays adequate defense all over the infield, pinch hits like a champ, and gets his 500+ AB at 2007 rates of production.
  • Willie Harris gives the Nationals excellent range and good OBP that made him a saber darling in LF a couple years back. Willy Taveras doesn't play at all. If necessary go outside the organization to acquire someone like Ryan Church instead.
  • Ian Desmond plays at near all-star level, with above-average defense and, a .350+ OBP and a .450+ SLG.
  • Nyjer Morgan regresses a little, but not too much.
  • Strasburg pitches 120 innings with an ERA under 3.80.
  • Lannan and Marquis repeat the performances from last season.
  • One other guy from among Livan, Mock, Olsen, Martin, Thompson, Wang, Stammen, and Detwiler emerges as a top-100 starter this year.
  • The bullpen performs overall like a run-of-the-mill below average bullpen, not a nightly train wreck.
If all those things happen, I figure the Nationals actually would get to around 84-85 win. Shoot, they could be the wild card. And taken in isolation, all these things could happen. And that's why we love opening day!

Sunday, April 4, 2010

Opening Day Podcast at "Natmosphere in your Ear"

Mark Zuckerman of Nats Insider joins me and Brian Oliver from Nationals Farm Authority to discuss our Nationals' 2010 predictions and (more optimistically) what it would take for the Nationals to finish above .500 this season. Click here for the download, and as always you can subscribe on I-Tunes here.

FJB's Official 2010 Big Predictions Post

Happy Opening Day Eve! Real games tonight, which means predictions are due. Here's what I'm seeing in the crystal ball for 2010:
  • Garrett Mock, Willie Harris and Alberto Gonzalez will be better than they were last year.
  • Nyjer Morgan and Josh Willingham will be worse.
  • Cristian Guzman will get 550 at bats.
  • Ryan Zimmerman will again win the gold glove and silver slugger.
  • Stephen Strasburg will make 20 starts and will not disappoint.
  • Adam Dunn or Josh Willingham will miss extended time with injury.
  • Aaron Thompson will end the year with more Wins Above Replacement than Chien-Ming Wang.
  • Matt Capps will lose the closer job at some point, compiling an ERA over 4.00, but he will get it back and finish the season with the most saves on the team.
  • Chris Coste will get as many at bats as Josh Bard did last year.
  • The Nationals will not pay the highest draft bonus in the 2010 draft.
  • On September 1, Tyler Walker and Miguel Batista will be former Nationals.
  • Brian Bruney will finish the season with an ERA over 5.00.
  • Ian Desmond will take some lumps, but at the end of the day, he'll solidify his role as the starting shortstop for 2011.
  • Manny Acta's Indians will finish over .500.
  • Cy Youngs: Roy Halladay and Felix Hernandez
  • MVPs: Albert Pujols and Alex Rodriguez
  • Rookies of the Year: Stephen Strasburg and Brian Matusz
  • NL playoff teams: Phillies, Cubs, Dodgers, Rockies
  • AL playoff teams: Red Sox, White Sox, Angels, Yankees
  • World Series: Red Sox over the Dodgers
  • And Nationals record: 68-94.
On the last prediction, it's certainly possible that they're better than this, but it's rare for any team to see a 10-win jump from one year to the next. I'm not sold on the bullpen, I don't think they've done enough to improve the fielding. Their offense was just average last year, will almost every key perfomer performed at a peak level. Probably most concerning is that there are just too many spots on the roster where they don't have a plan B. If they lose Dunn, Willingham, Morgan, or god forbid Zimmerman for any period of time, they don't have even replacement-level options.

Playing Out of Position... at (almost) Every Position

One of the trends that's emerging over the Riggleman-Rizzo tenure is a willingness to move players around the diamond to positions they've never played before. All teams move players around from time to time, and it can sometimes be a good idea, or a bad one, depending on the player and the situation.

This spring, the Nationals' willingness to move players has resulted in a depth chart where as many as half the players on the field at any given time could be playing a position where they have little or no major league experience.

Consider these career numbers (regular season only):
Willie Harris: 10 innings in RF
Willy Taveras: 1 inning in RF
Mike Morse: 28 games total in the outfield (and 11 in the minors)
Cristian Guzman: 0 innings at 2B, 3B, RF, etc.
Josh Willingham: 4 innings at 1B

There are other less extreme examples. Adam Dunn is still relatively new to first base. Justin Maxwell hasn't played much in right, nor has Roger Bernadina. Alberto Gonzalez hasn't played much at third. Etc.

Now, again, this isn't necessarily a good thing or a bad thing. You can improve your team by reshuffling the players to a more optimal defensive alignment, or by finding more at bats for better hitters. Some of these position changes might not even matter much. How different is RF from CF? Assuming Harris and Taveras can make the throws, probably not much. And it's not that unusual--just a more extreme version of what you see on every team from time to time.

But it's at least noteworthy. First, it's not like the Nationals are being forced into this scenario because of injuries. They're starting the season healthy, and this is plan A. They planned it this way. Second, it could make the team more mistake-prone, and that's something to watch. Third, Rizzo's talked so much about upgrading the defense during the off-season year. This is another indication that he really didn't prioritize that.

Finally, my biggest question is that the team isn't really moving players so much as asking a lot of guys to be utility players. One super-utility guy on the roster should be plenty--they shouldn't need four. It seems less like this is a plan and more just a lot of tinkering, resulting in a misshapen final product. If that's what's happening, it's a bad process that doesn't bode well for the future.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

Out of Options

I see commenters often ask about whether specific players have options left. So as a reader service, here's the list of Nationals players who are "out of options," i.e., cannot be sent to the minors without clearing waivers first.
Jason Bergmann
Brian Bruney
Sean Burnett
Tyler Clippard
Alberto Gonzalez
Mike Morse
Tyler Walker
Josh Willingham
(Also, MLB Trade Rumors keeps a pretty good list for every team here.)

Friday, April 2, 2010

Updated Nationals Wins Above Replacement Projection

With just a couple days before the games count, here's the latest projection for the Nationals' wins above replacement. They've slipped to a 73.5 WAR team, mainly as a result of Willy Taveras getting playing time from Mike Morse in my last projection. I also updated the starting rotation likelies and adjusted for Ian Desmond winning the starting job.

As a reminder, I'm using Tom Tango's system for calculating WAR, plugging in performance projections from CHONE, available at baseballprojection.com, and the playing time guesstimates are from me.

First, the hitters, then pitchers:

Pos Name PT wOBA FRAA WAR
C Ivan Rodriguez 60% .290 0.0 0.47
C Jesus Flores 20% .324 0.0 0.57
C Wil Nieves 20% .284 0.0 0.08
1B Adam Dunn 85% .378 -8.4 2.34
1B Mike Morse 15% .343 0.3 0.23
2B Adam Kennedy 75% .313 1.8 1.00
2B Cristian Guzman 25% .316 0.0 0.34
SS Ian Desmond 65% .324 -4.5 1.22
SS Cristian Guzman 35% .316 -2.0 0.58
3B Ryan Zimmerman 85% .379 10.1 5.22
3B Cristian Guzman 15% .316 0.0 0.20
RF Willie Harris 50% .328 0.0 0.53
RF Willy Taveras 35% .300 0.0 -0.22
RF Mike Morse 15% .343 -0.3 0.29
CF Nyjer Morgan 85% .321 8.5 2.11
CF Willie Harris 15% .328 -0.6 0.30
LF Josh Willingham 85% .361 -6.0 2.94
LF Mike Morse 15% .343 0.0 0.30

Total


18.51



IP nERA WAR
SP Jason Marquis 180 4.73 1.5
SP John Lannan 170 4.58 1.7
SP Livan Hernandez 120 5.05 0.6
SP Craig Stammen 120 5.19 0.4
SP Garrett Mock 100 4.69 0.9
SP Scott Olsen 90 5.33 0.2
SP J.D. Martin 70 4.68 0.6
SP Chien-Ming Wang 50 3.93 0.9
SP Ross Detwiler 50 4.97 0.3
SP Stephen Strasburg 50 4.22 0.7
RP Matt Capps 65 4.02 0.3
RP Tyler Clippard 65 4.02 0.3
RP Jason Bergmann 60 4.30 0.1
RP Brian Bruney 55 4.15 0.2
RP Sean Burnett 55 4.63 -0.1
RP Miguel Batista 50 5.36 -0.5
RP Tyler Walker 40 4.11 0.2
RP Drew Storen 40 6.12 -0.7

Total 1430
7.7

Right Track / Wrong Track Poll Results... And a New Poll!

The right-track number held steady this month at 80%. We shall see what happens when the real games start. Don't forget to vote on the right hand side of this page.

Thursday, April 1, 2010

This Is What 100 Losses Looks Like

I guess this could be a somewhat lame April Fool's joke, but Adam Kilgore tweets: "As of now, Willy Taveras will be the #Nats right-handed platoon option in RF, Riggleman said."

Willy Taveras is awful. Here are his rates against left-handed pitching:
2009: .219 / .245 / .257
Career: .262 / .309 / .326
Just absolutely inexcusable that any team would go into a season planning to give starts to a guy like this. They can't even blame injuries. This is as bad or worse than anything we've seen from this team in the last five years. Rizzo better have something up his sleeve.

And since he's never played right field, I want to see him make the throws before conceding he's even a plus-defender out there.